Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in October 2025

Trial procedure support

A member with a complaint of harassment or discrimination as outlined in Article F.1(m) of the CUPE constitution has the choice of having their complaint resolved through either the trial procedure or the alternate process.

A member can ask for support from the Safer Union Spaces Office before submitting a complaint to the trial procedure or after a complaint has been filed.

The Safer Union Spaces Office Casework Specialists can support members who have a harassment or discrimination complaint by:

  • Offering trauma informed support and resources
  • Sharing information on their options in the trial procedure and other processes
  • Support with a needs assessment to help the complainant determine whether the alternate process or trial procedure are the right fit

The casework specialists are available to meet with both complainants and respondents within the trial procedure.

You can reach out to get more information by emailing saferspaces@cupe.ca

Squamish municipal workers begin job action to secure a fair contract

Members of CUPE 2269 (District of Squamish workers) began rotating job action yesterday. After nearly a year at the bargaining table, workers have been unable to secure a fair deal that addresses key issues including competitive wages that keep pace with the real cost of everyday life.

“Taking job action is always a last resort,” said Celeste Bickford president of CUPE 2269. “No one wants to be on strike, but our members deserve wages and benefits that reflect the real cost of living and the value of the work they do.”

Services impacted

The first phase of job action will be limited in scope and will not involve a full-scale strike. Beginning today (Thursday, October 2), the following services will be impacted:

  • An overtime ban will be in place across the Public Works department.
  • Drop-in admission fees will not be collected at the Brennan Park Recreation Center.
  • Bylaw Officers will not issue parking tickets.

Institut Philippe-Pinel employees on the brink of burnout

Workers at the Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel are speaking out against an increasingly toxic work environment, marked by a refusal to grant leaves even during off-peak periods. Ongoing, despite the union’s repeated appeals, the situation is contributing to staff burnout, unplanned absences and an unprecedented staff retention crisis.

Members with 15, 20, even 25 years of seniority are being denied their leave requests and, fearing for their vacations too, they have had to take non-consecutive weeks at unsuitable times. The employer first used the COVID-19 pandemic as a pretext and then pointed to the shortage of workers to justify this new system. However, the problem is not unpredictable; it is chronic. Their contingency plan has indeed become the norm, leaving teams compromised and employees on the brink of burnout.

“Pinel created the staff shortage,” denounced Alexa Lachaine, acting president of CUPE 2960. “It has neglected its employees’ mental health and made their work-life balance extremely difficult. Instead of implementing strategies to prevent burnout, the employer is accelerating exhaustion. It’s a vicious circle.”

Furthermore, depending on services and shifts, vacation ratios have been reduced in recent years, so much so that they are now two to three times lower.

These denials come at a time when working conditions at the Institut are deteriorating. The employer is trivializing violence and neglecting its responsibility to ensure health and safety in the workplace. Staff turnover is so high that there is often a shortage of experienced workers on the floor. Disciplinary investigations are increasingly frequent and resulting sanctions extremely severe. The advent of Santé Québec had raised hopes of a turnaround, but it is becoming clear that the Institut is not showing up and the duly negotiated collective agreement is increasingly disregarded.

“Our members care for the most misunderstood population in Quebec,” she concluded. “And they do so in an environment that normalizes violence and degraded working conditions. How can a provincial institute of forensic psychiatry claim to be a leader in mental health yet so mistreat its own employees?”

The union demands that Santé Québec intervene immediately and the Institut respect union members’ negotiated rights. This dehumanizing management approach must be put to an end.

Quebec education workers cautiously welcome the removal of hiring caps

Quebec’s Conseil provincial du soutien scolaire and CUPE’s education sector are cautiously welcoming Minister of Education Sonia Lebel’s decision to remove the caps on full-time equivalent positions imposed by her predecessor, Bernard Drainville. Though welcome, this measure does not address the deep-seated issues facing school support staff and professionals in Quebec.

“The removal of the caps is a positive sign,” said Michelle Poulin, president of the Conseil provincial du soutien scolaire and vice-president of CUPE Québec’s education sector. “However, lifting an administrative constraint isn’t going to meet desperate needs in the field. Support staff and professionals are key to educational success, and budget decisions must reflect it.”

For months now, service centres and school principals have making agonizing choices, forced to curb hiring, suspend extracurricular activities or sometimes even forgo maternity or sick leave replacements. Staffing levels are too low in many establishments to adequately meet growing needs. Such decisions directly impact students, especially children who receive crucial support from remedial teachers, special education technicians, after-school daycare providers and other non-teaching staff.

“We welcome Ms. Lebel’s intention to support school service centres, but we remind you that it also takes listening, dialogue and adequate resources,” concluded Ms. Poulin.

Ford’s hiring freeze hurts Ontario homecare workers

Doug Ford has once again put Ontario homecare patients last. His announcement on Friday of a hiring freeze for all crown agencies in Ontario, will exacerbate the ongoing workload and staffing shortages being experienced in Ontario’s healthcare system.

The hiring freeze came into effect on September 27, with the government’s press release stating they will be meeting with 143 agencies “over the coming weeks” to ensure that agencies, boards, and commissions, “human resources strategies align with this direction.” This implies that agencies were not given advanced warning that this policy was coming, meaning that public services like Ontario Health atHome will need to pivot to account for this last-minute decision.

Retroactively, meeting with affected agencies shows this government isn’t interested in meaningful consultations with the agencies that deliver services for Ontarians. Despite the government’s blanket claim that staffing in government agencies has risen more than five times the rate of OPS since 2023, the reality is that this 2.3% annual growth does not keep up with the demands placed on the homecare system by population growth and aging, to speak nothing of other government directives to divert patients from hospitals.

Ontario Health atHome workers already struggle to keep up with daunting caseloads and short staffing. This ongoing issue with understaffing of front-line services in homecare will only be made worse by Ford’s decision to freeze hiring.

This sudden announcement is just another step to hollow out our public services and healthcare system to open the door for private delivery of public services. When the government chokes the system through policies like this, it results in service cuts and increased financial burdens for the public. Cutting staffing through attrition to account for a lack of available office space won’t improve services for Ontarians, it will just make an already over-burdened system harder to navigate.

The government especially needs to recognize that all Ontario Health atHome workers are “front facing staff” that should not be covered by this policy – and ensure that front-facing workers are consulted in the formulation of policies that impact the public services we are sworn to deliver.