Posts published in December 2025
A hundred people joined a demonstration today in downtown Montreal. Gathering in front of the offices of Axium Infrastructure, the main shareholder of the Montréal Gateway Terminals Partnership (MGTP), demonstrators expressed solidarity with 32 MGTP agents that have been on strike since September 22, 2025.
“We had to bring the pressure to where the decision-makers were,” said CUPE representative Loïc Blanchard. “That’s why we’re here today. It’s time to come to an agreement, and our members want a fair settlement. The company is very profitable because of our members. The workers deserve better!”
The last collective agreement for members expired on December 31, 2024. On September 11, members voted 96% in favour of a strike action.
Discussions as of recent have come to a stalemate over contracting out and wages. Further, the employer has not agreed on the minimum operating requirements to keep the terminals running smoothly. The latest offer was rejected by a unanimous vote.
The employer and the union are scheduled to take part in mediation on December 16 and 17.
CUPE is concerned federal consultations to update Canada’s strategy on artificial intelligence were rushed and favoured corporate interests at the expense of other voices.
In a letter to Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Evan Solomon, our union warns that the short timelines, lack of taskforce representation and corporate-heavy consultation mean the updated strategy likely won’t address workers’ needs and protect the public interest.
In October, the federal government held a consultation and struck a taskforce on an updated Canadian AI strategy.
Although the government appointed a representative from CUPE to the AI Strategy Taskforce, they excluded many other groups and experts including unions, civil society organizations, and researchers on AI and work, AI governance, privacy, and human rights.
CUPE is calling for the consultation to be extended and broadened to ensure a more representative and fair process.
CUPE’s submission to the consultation makes recommendations in five key areas:
Develop comprehensive laws and regulations
The federal government should mandate:
- transparency when AI systems are introduced in the workplace
- restrictions and safeguards when bosses use algorithms to manage workers
- strong data protection and privacy laws that protect workers’ dignity and autonomy.
Invest in public AI infrastructure
The federal government should invest in public AI technology including cloud infrastructure, data management and AI models and applications.
Public ownership promotes accountability and transparency and advances the public interest. It also strengthens Canada’s digital sovereignty, which is our ability to control the digital infrastructure, services and data that affect democracy, the economy and society.
Consult widely and support research
The federal government should make it a priority to consult unions, academic researchers, civil society and other affected groups.
The government should also create an observatory on work and AI, and sector-based groups that assess AI’s impacts on jobs, public services, bias and discrimination, and privacy.
Invest in education, training and a strong social safety net
The federal government should invest in digital literacy education for workers and the public, as well as in training and retraining for public sector workers using AI.
The federal government should also strengthen social safety net supports like Employment Insurance for workers who will be displaced because of AI.
Protect our energy system and the environment
The federal government should manage data centre growth to ensure the security and sustainability of our energy system, and to meet Canada’s climate change goals.
We must make sure the benefits of technological change are shared with workers and the public. This will only happen if governments across Canada, starting with the federal government, put in place guardrails to minimize potential harms from digital technology like AI.
St. Anne Community and Nursing Care Centre workers, represented by CUPE 5032, voted 91% in favour of a strike mandate.
“It’s incredibly frustrating that it [bargaining] has come to this, to taking a strike vote,” said CUPE 5032 President Annette Boudreau, “but after two years with an expired contract, watching every other health care sector get raises, watching long-term care workers get raises that make us the lowest paid in Atlantic Canada, it’s not surprising. We’re underpaid and overworked, and the government doesn’t seem to care.”
Long-term care workers in Nova Scotia are the lowest paid in Atlantic Canada, with several classifications, such as cooks and seamstresses, making under $20 an hour. Recent collective agreements in other provinces such as Prince Edward Island have resulted in a nearly $10 an hour wage difference for classifications such as dietary aides.
“When we talk wages, regardless of the job or classification, there’s always someone who says, ‘well, they should get a different job,’ and my response to that is a question in return: who will take care of our elderly if every long term care worker leaves the sector? What are we supposed to do then?” asked CUPE Long Term Care Coordinator Tammy Martin. “The solution isn’t changing jobs—it’s paying these workers what they deserve.”
CUPE long term care workers in the New Glasgow area will be gathering outside the New Glasgow Farmers Market on December 13th from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for an information picket to raise further awareness about their bargaining issues.
The Liberal government’s new federal affordable housing agency is relying on an outdated and faulty playbook. Details for Build Canada Homes (BCH) show a plan to use public-private partnerships (P3s) that invites real estate developers and investors to profit from public housing spending.
Mark Carney has made big promises about generational investments in housing. But the Parliamentary Budget Officer has found that federal spending on housing is actually set to drop by 56 per cent by 2028-29.
P3s in social housing
BCH’s mandate is to focus primarily on non-market housing including public, non-profit and co-operative housing. But the investment framework specifies that the private sector is encouraged to work with social housing providers and that builds can happen through P3s.
CUPE is not opposed to all private sector involvement in social housing. It is appropriate for private companies to be involved in designing and building social housing. Private financing has allowed social housing providers to build, though at a higher cost than much-needed government funding and financing could provide. But, the danger in the BCH plan is that private, for-profit corporations could be guaranteed long-term profits through lucrative partnerships with non-profit social housing providers, all supported with public funding and public land.
This approach risks turning social housing, the one segment of the housing sector that has been protected from corporate greed, into a source of profit. Research has shown that treating housing as a way of generating profit, rather than as a human right, is a key driver of Canada’s housing crisis.
Targets and affordability
BCH must release a detailed plan with targets and timelines for the federal government to build social housing. Efforts should be targeted to people in core housing need who spend more than 30 per cent of their income on housing. It must also include concrete targets to build housing for people who are unhoused.
BCH’s definitions of housing affordability are income-based, a key CUPE demand. Previously, the federal government called housing “affordable” even when most workers couldn’t afford it. But there’s a catch: the agency based its affordability measure on the incomes of both homeowners and renters. That means so-called affordable homes may still be out of reach for many because renters earn less, on average, than homeowners.
The federal government needs to go back to the drawing board and build a new national housing strategy that works for workers. This means using public money and public lands for the public interest, putting restrictions on large-scale investors in residential real estate and creating enforceable minimum standards for tenants, including rent control and vacancy control.
Read more about CUPE’s position on housing in Housing in a Time of Crisis: CUPE’s Policy Statement.
